"Just" a New Development Procedure

4 PM January 27, 2004

Proposed addition to the standard corporate development procedures:

Henceforth, any developer that uses the word “just” while describing or estimating the implementation of a new feature to a manager will be assigned the design, coding and testing tasks for that feature.

By alang | # | Comments (5)
(Posted to Software Development and javablogs)

Comments

At 23:00, 27 Jan 2004 Mr Ed wrote:

Agreed.

To which I would like to add the word "doable". Anyone found claiming off-the-cuff that a particular development task is doable, should be the one to do it.

(#)
At 23:50, 27 Jan 2004 Mark Matthews wrote:

Along with the words "Easy", "Trivial", or any derivation of "will only take XX minutes" :-)

(#)
At 01:46, 28 Jan 2004 Andy Lester wrote:

In my shop, we call it "CYJ", or "Can't you just..." If anyone gets hot to jump on a project, we say "I think that's a CYJ."

I wrote about this on my oreillynet.com blog, including a link to why sometimes "just" is the way to go. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3593

(#)
At 09:56, 28 Jan 2004 Jeffrey Shell wrote:

The forbidden word at my previous engineering job was 'simply'

- "the user simply enters this and clicks here"

- "all you do is simply reload the frobnitz module into the local namespace"

(#)
At 12:11, 01 Feb 2004 David Pinn wrote:

Like somebody well known to both of us is fond of saying, "Anything is possible; it's a simple matter of programming."

(#)

Add Comment




(Not displayed)






(Leave blank line between paragraphs. URLs converted to links. HTML stripped. Indented source code will be formatted with <pre> tags.)




© 2003-2006 Alan Green