Sci-fi Surveillance

12 AM December 22, 2004

Life in the future will be a lot simpler if surveillance systems are properly installed.

I draw this conclusion from my research with Babylon 5 and Crusade, Star Trek (Original, TNG, DS9, Voyager, Enterprise, movies I – VI, Generations and First Contact), Blake’s 7, Dr Who, Earth 2, Star Wars (five movies), V, fifty-odd other sci-fi movies and (sadly) Space 1999.

A common thread in these stories is the lack of security cameras aboard the good guy’s space ships. The bad guys sometimes have security cameras, but only if the good guys can work around them.

If I were in charge, I’d be deploying surveillance in the form of hundreds of small packages – less than a millimetre on a side – each containing a video camera, and a microphone, as well as sensors to measure magnetic fields, radiation, gravity, and the passage of time. Each corridor and public area would have a few dozen sensors glued to the walls and floor. The sensors would form a self monitoring network, always on the lookout for temporal anomolies, injuries, covert meetings, unexpected structural weakening, and bad-guys. The surveillance recordings would also be available to the captain for review whenever nescessary.

I’m sure the script writers can come up with other ways to make life interesting for their characters, but a captain should know what has happenned on his own star ship or military base. Especially when they should have learnt to expect the unexpected.

I have also concluded that far too many sci-fi TV shows have numbers in their names.

PS: Two upcoming episodes of Star Trek Enterprise will explain why Kirk-era Klingons don’t have much makeup forehead ridges, bulging muscles and long hair. Cool.

By alang | # | Comments (3)
(Posted to Rants and javablogs)

Only smart kids cheat

11 PM December 16, 2004

The Sydney Morning Herald had a report yesterday that some Higher School Certificate students had discovered their results before the official release date. On my reading of the article, the Board of Studies had placed the results on the public web server, and all that was required was for some student to work out the correct URLs.

You’d think an official body would know better.

When somebody puts information on a public web site, that’s the equivalent of writing it on a big piece of cardboard and leaving it on the side of the road. It will eventually get noticed. Trying to hide the information by keep the URL secret is like putting your piece of cardboard under a bush on the side of the road. It’s just a matter of time before somebody curious looks behind the bush and finds your big secret. Moral: if it’s secret, don’t make it publicly accessible.

There is no talk of punishment or sanctions for these kids. This is sensible. It would be a pity if they suffered for the board’s incompetence.

Funny thing is, all the kids who were interviewed by the SMH did very well – mostly 90 plus. Which goes to show – only the smart kids cheat.

By alang | # | Comments (1)
(Posted to Software Development and Rants)

Mnemonic?

1 AM December 7, 2004

The word "mnemonic" is kind of anti-onomatopoeic. Has anybody got a good way to remember how to spell it?

By alang | # | Comments (6)
(Posted to Rants)
© 2003-2006 Alan Green